Archive

Archive for the ‘PII’ Category

Updates to the Map of Crypto Law.

September 30, 2009 Leave a comment
Google Map of International Crypto Law

Google Map of International Crypto Law

There have been a few updates to the famous map of crypto laws lately, for those new to the map, or who have forgotten it I’ve linked the picture above to it.

Fell free to mail me with corrections and additions.

H.R 2221 – The Federal Data Accountability and Trust Act

September 30, 2009 Leave a comment

This week I’ve been working my way through H.R 2221 – the “Data Accountability and Trust Act” . This proposed legislation is making its way through the Committee on Energy and Commerce at the moment, and if passed, will rationalize data protection legislation across the USA at a federal level. Read more…

Missouri’s new Data Protection Disclosure Law.

September 21, 2009 Leave a comment

Although maybe unnoticed, a month ago Missouri finally joined that heady club called “States which have Data Privacy Laws”.

On 28th August, the “Missouri Data Breach Notification Law”, or House Bill 62 took effect, not protecting, but at least enforcing care and attention of residents personal information (Social Security Numbers, Driver’s Licence Numbers, and information which could be used to access a residents financial accounts). Note I use the word “resident”, because, as with the other 47 or so State laws, this one applies to the Residents of Missouri, not to the businesses. If you have Missouri resident information in your datacenter in Tinbuktoo, you are still required (under civil and actual damages) to comply. Read more…

McAfee Data Protection, HIPPA, HITECH and breach notification.

September 14, 2009 Leave a comment

Last week, one of my colleagues asked me to comment on 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164, which for those of us who can’t remember all the code names for the various USA Federal docs, is the one in which the Department of Health and Human Services publishes its interim final rule under HIPPA and HITECH re what data falls under these regulations, what a “breach” means, and the conditions in which data is deemed to have been “protected”.

Under HITECH/HIPPA, basically there is a duty in the USA to care for the privacy of “unsecured protected health information” – this means that anyone electronically processing our heath information has a duty of care to make sure no unauthorised people gain access to it, and a legal duty to inform us if a breach (or possible breach) of trust occurs. Read more…

Army National Guard shows how much it cares about 131,000 identities…

August 6, 2009 Leave a comment

National Guard Website

A busy week in the world of data loss, with the report from the Army National Guard Leaders that a personal laptop containing the records of 131,000 former and current guard members was stolen from a contractor on 27th July 2009. The information included the usual culprits – Name, Address, Social Security Number etc.

What this information was doing on a contractors personal device, and not locked up and restricted is undisclosed, but the important thing is that the Army Guard is showing it’s eagerness to resolve the situation and protect its members. Read more…

FSA Fines HSBC Companies $7,500,000 for data security issues

July 23, 2009 Leave a comment

Following on from my recent posts regarding fines and the cost of data leakage (TJX and Cornell), I thought I’d also bring to your attention the latest initiated by the FSA (Financial Services Authority of UK) against HSBC – On 22nd July A tidy penalty of £4,550,000 ($7.5m) for two failures to protect personal information. HSBC will get a nice 30% discount on this for early payment, leaving them with a bill for £3,185,000 ($5.26m) plus their own internal costs.

Read more…

Changes to PII and PCI regulations in Nevada

This week Linda McGlasson talked on BankInfo security about some changes to Nevada’s data protection stance. Nevada’s laws are no less complex than other states, but interestingly they have a few which, when combined, give a tighter than usual position.

The interesting bills are CHAPTER 603A – SECURITY OF PERSONAL INFORMATION, which deals with the regulations of Business Practices. This law puts the state teeth behind the PCI regulations, enforcing things which the payment card industry require as part of PCI compliance with state-driven criminal and financial penalties. Read more…

TJX (T.J. Maxx) reaches settlement with states on Data Loss

June 24, 2009 3 comments

For those who were included in the January 2007 94 million record loss of credit card numbers from TJX (Still the highest loss by number of records ever reported), You may be interested to know that they have agreed a settlement with the 41 various states on the fine. Around $5.5 million of the settlement was for data and consumer protection, and $1.75 million to reimburse the states costs of the investigation.

You can read the details of the deal struck with the FTC from their website. Read more…

Categories: Data Loss, PII Tags: , ,

Cornell University looses 45,000 records..

June 24, 2009 1 comment

datalossdb.org entryCornell University Entry

Another typical notification of data loss by an educational establishment. In summary, the personal details of around 45,000 current and former students and staff were lost when the laptop containing them was stolen.

Cornell have been very open with the facts of the matter, their site talks about what they have, and will do about it, and the help they are offering people affected. They also mentioned that their policy is that such data should be either encrypted, or in a secure location. Two things they admit this particular member of staff violated. Read more…

Data Loss Goes Personal…

June 18, 2009 Leave a comment

Today I received yet another of those annoying “We may have lost your personal information…” letters from my bank. No information on how it happened, or what they are doing to stop it happening again. It’s almost as though this was an inevitable and repeatable condition of doing business….

Yet again I’m going to get another bank card, yet again I’m going to have to change the numbers in my Blockbuster, Amazon, etc. accounts, and (again) I have yet another free 12 month subscription to “Identity Theft Monitoring.”

Great news indeed, but I suspect many readers of this blog have also been through this a few times as well.

Read more…